I believe it is the English's fault because I learned that they would make them drunk and then trade with them when they were drunk to rip them off. They also acted to cool for school and acted like they did not need them. They also killed many Indians just because they did not help them. That is why i believe it is the Englishes fault.
I think the English caused King Philip’s War. I think this because the indians were on that land first , and if they went somewhere else they wouldn’t have lost as many people. Those were some reasons why I think the English caused King Philip’s War.
I think King Philip is guilty because he made his collonists do all of the work and had no respect for others. He also took no responsibality and was very greety. Therefore, I think king philip is guilty of starting the war
I think that the English settlers were more to blame for causing the war. One way is that they forced the Indians to observe their religion even if they didn’t want to. Another way they started the war is that their cattle stomped over the Indians land and ruined their soil and crops. Lastly, the English made very unfair trades with the Indians. Those are a few of the reasons why I think the English were more to blame for starting the war.
I think that the English caused the war more than King Phillip did for a couple reasons. So here are a few reasons. First of all the English forced the Indians into being Christians. Also the Indians went to were king Phillip was and they brought him to court and imprisoned him sometimes. Lastly after a whiles when the English traded with the Indians sometimes they would rip them off and not be fair. Those were some reasons why I think th English cause the war instead of the Indians.
I definitely think the English were to blame for King Philips war. I think that because the English manipulated the Indiana’s by getting them drunk so they could cheat them out of land. Another reason is the English cattle was eating the Indians corn on their land since they did not fence them in. The last reason is that the Indians tried to negotiate and avoid war, but the English lied by pretending to be nice and friends. I think the English were not to be trusted and were to be blamed for the war.
I think the English people were more to blame. One reason is they made the Indians learn a religion that they didn’t want to learn. They also made very bad and unfair trades to the Indians.Lastly the English cattle went on the Indians' land which made the Indians mad.That's why I think the English were more to blame in starting the war.
This is a very hard choice but I think the Indians are more to blame. I think they are more to blame because they thought they killed King Philip's dad.So they killed the cattle and burned the houses.They also made noise at night and that woke the English which lead to war. I understand both sides, but I think the Indians are more to blame.
I think the English were to blame for the war. The land originally belonged to the Indians, but the British slowly stole it. The English thought they were better than the Indians and forced their religion on them. I also believe that the English cheated the Indians in their negotiations. For these reasons, I think the English were not fair with the Indians and were to blame for the war.
I think the English is more to blame for the King Philip's War. I believe that King Philip's argument was more persuasive because he gave more specific examples of what the English did. For example, he said the English men made them drunk and cheated them. He also explained how the English did not use fences. Their cattle and horses would ruin the corn and land. The English would only tell what the Indians did, but not describe it. That's why I think the English are more to blame for King Philip's War.
I think that the English are more to blame because they did not respect the Indians, they arrived with guns, they tried to trick them well they were drunk to get there land, and they took there land and did not put a fence around it and the cows got out and ruined there crops.The English are more to blame because of all of there disrespect toward the Indians.
I think that the English started the war because the Natives were there first, and also because the English were not treating the natives fairly, also this is because the English kept on taking land and crops from the Natives.
The English are more to blame for the war because they did many bad things to the Indians. For example, the English took land from the Indians and let their cattle and horses eat the crops on Indian lands. Also, the Indians didn't have any rights, and if they accused the English of doing something wrong nothing would be done. The Indian argument is more persuasive to me because the English did not treat the Indians well and it was the land of the Indians to begin with. Those are reasons why I feel the English are more to blame for the war.
I think the English are more to blame for 2 reasons, my first reason the English are more to blame is because the boy who shot the Indian from his front porch technically started the war. The Indian argument is more persuasive to me because King Philip thought they killed his father, would you be mad if someone killed your father.
October 13, 2018
Both the English and the Indians argument were very persuasive. I believe that the Englishmen started the war. I believe this because they made the Indians drunk and cheated them for their land and money. Furthermore, Englishmen didn’t use a fence and their horses and cattle ruined the Indians corn. Finally, the Indians gave the English 100 times more land then they had for themselves and the English still disrespected them. These are some reasons why I believe that the English started King Philip's War.
I think the English is more to blame because they treated the Indians unfairly. One example of the English treating the Indians badly is that the English made them drunk and then asked them for land. Another way the English took advantage of the Indians is by ripping them off for land and food. Also the English treated the Indians unfairly because they forced the Indians to be Christians. I think the Indians were nice to the English, but the English were not nice to them back. These are a few of the reasons the English were more to blame.
I think that the English are to blame and that King Philip's argument is more persuasive. King Philip gave examples of bad things the English did. First, he said the English stole land from the Indians. Also, he said that the English made the Indians drunk and cheated them. Lastly, King Philip described how the English cattle and horses destroyed the Indian's corn since there was no fence. In conclusion, I believe King Philip that the English did very bad things to the Indians.
I think personally that the people to blame are the English, and the Natives´ story is more persuasive and these are the reasons why.
The first reason why is that the Native´s came before and the English just kept taking land without even asking. The second reason why is that the Natives camed unarmed, it´s obvious that the Natives did nothing. The third and last reason is that the English made them drunk, and then cheated on them.
Those are the reasons why I think the Natives´ story is more persuasive and the people to blame are the English.
There were many things to blame on both sides. I think Plymouth is more to blame because they were the ones who took up the wampanoags land. They were rude to the wampanoags. Finally Plymouth took the first shot. Those are just a few reasons why Plymouth is more to blame.
It was King Philip falt because the Indians were teaching them how to grow crops and King Philip just was being mean to the Indians
I think that the Indians are right because the English abused them and took their land. The English were wrong in trying to steal land and they murdered Indians too. The Indians gave them more than 100 times more land then they had, yet the English still wanted more.
King Philip's war was a war between the Indians and the English colonists in 1675. I think the English were more to blame for the war because the English took up too much land, and they stole land from the Indians. Secondly, the English brought cattle and horses and let them on indian farms. Lastly, the English were unfair. If an English colonist was unjust, they would do nothing, but if an Indian did anything they didn’t like, he would be arrested. In conclusion, the Indians’ arguments were more persuasive.
I think the English started the war for a few reasons. One reason is that they would make the Indians drunk so they could offer bad deals and the Indians would accept the offers. Another reason is that the English let their horses and cattle run on the Indians plants which might have rubbed of harmful diseases onto the Indians plants. My final reason is if King Philip went to 20 of the most honest Indians they would all report they either were harmed or saw someone harmed by Englishmen. Those are some of the reasons I think the English started King Philip's War.
I think the New England colonists were partially to blame as they made the Indians believe in a different religion that they were not used to.The Indians seemed to have an unfair advantage to the colonists. The actions of the colonists seemed to bully the Indians into many different ways and used them to their advantage. I think that the Indians also were smart in using the colonists to their advantage as well. Both sides were equally to blame.
Good point made.
You may earn bonus points in SS by answering the blog question of the unit in a complete 5th grade paragraph. Post in a comment on this blog.